Epidemiology of healthcare-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units: Are sink drains to blame?

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections (PA-HAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to describe the epidemiology of PA-HAI in ICUs in Ontario, Canada, and determine whether we could identify episodes of sink-to-patient PA transmission. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients in six ICUs from 2018-2019, with retrieval of PA clinical isolates, and PA-screening of antimicrobial resistant organism surveillance rectal swabs, and of sink drain, air, and faucet samples. All PA isolates underwent whole genome sequencing. PA-HAI was defined using US National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. ICU-acquired PA was defined as PA isolated from specimens obtained >48 hours after ICU admission in those with prior negative rectal swabs. Sink-to-patient PA transmission was defined as ICU-acquired PA with close genomic relationship to isolate(s) previously recovered from sinks in a room/bedspace occupied 3-14 days prior to the relevant patient isolate. RESULTS: Over ten months, 72 PA-HAI occurred among 60/4263 admissions. The rate of PA-HAI was 2.40 per 1000 patient-ICU days; higher in patients who were PA-colonized on admission. PA-HAI was associated with longer stay (median 26 vs 3 days uninfected, p<0.001) and contributed to death in 22/60 cases (36.7%). Fifty-eight admissions with ICU-acquired PA were identified, contributing 35/72 (48.6%) PA-HAI. Four patients with five PA-HAI (6.9%) had closely related isolates previously recovered from their room/bedspace sinks. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of PA causing HAI appeared to be acquired in ICUs, and 7% of PA-HAI were associated with sink-to-patient transmission. Sinks may be an underrecognized reservoir for HAIs.

Classification of post COVID-19 condition symptoms: a longitudinal study in the Belgian population.

OBJECTIVES: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, most research has focused on its acute pathophysiology, yet some people tend to experience persisting symptoms beyond the acute phase of infection, referred to as post COVID-19 condition (PCC). However, evidence on PCC is still scarce. This study aimed to assess the distribution, classification of symptoms and associated factors of PCC in adults. DESIGN: Longitudinal online cohort study. SETTING: National study in Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were Belgian adults with a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection and were recruited when called up for contact tracing. A total of 3039 participants were included and completed an online questionnaire at the time of their infection and again 3 months later. OUTCOME MEASURES: The baseline questionnaire assessed the initial health status of the participants and their status during the acute phase of the infection. The follow-up questionnaire assessed their PCC status 3 months after infection. A latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to assess whether there are different classes of individuals with a similar set of self-reported PCC symptoms. RESULTS: Half of the participants reported PCC 3 months after infection (47%). The most frequent symptoms were fatigue (21%), headache (11%) and memory problems (10%). The LCA highlighted three different classes of PCC symptoms with different risk factors: (1) a combination of loss of smell and taste, (2) a combination of neurological symptoms and (3) other heterogeneous symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing number of people who underwent COVID-19, PCC has become an important but complex public health problem due to the heterogeneity of its symptoms. The classification of symptoms performed in this study can help give insight into different aetiologies of PCC and better plan care according to the symptoms and needs of those affected.

Household Transmission of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Data on household transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) remain limited. We studied risk of CPE household co-colonization and transmission in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We enrolled CPE index cases (identified via population-based surveillance from January 2015 to October 2018) and their household contacts. At months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, participants provided rectal and groin swabs. Swabs were cultured for CPE until September 2017, when direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR; with culture of specimens if a carbapenemase gene was detected) replaced culture. CPE risk factor data were collected by interview and combined with isolate whole-genome sequencing to determine likelihood of household transmission. Risk factors for household contact colonization were explored using a multivariable logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Ninety-five households with 177 household contacts participated. Sixteen (9%) household contacts in 16 (17%) households were CPE-colonized. Household transmission was confirmed in 3/177 (2%) cases, probable in 2/177 (1%), possible in 9/177 (5%), and unlikely in 2/177 (1%). Household contacts were more likely to be colonized if they were the index case's spouse (odds ratio [OR], 6.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-36.35), if their index case remained CPE-colonized at household enrollment (OR, 7.00; 95% CI, 1.92-25.49), or if they had at least 1 set of specimens processed after direct PCR was introduced (OR, 6.46; 95% CI, 1.52-27.40). CONCLUSIONS: Nine percent of household contacts were CPE-colonized; 3% were a result of household transmission. Hospitals may consider admission screening for patients known to have CPE-colonized household contacts.